• July 05, 2022, 06:07:46 am

Author Topic: Stop Online Piracy Act  (Read 1930 times)

Warden

  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,745
  • BNTA Admin
    • Battle.net Terrorist Alliance
Stop Online Piracy Act
« on: January 19, 2012, 09:56:00 pm »
Quote
One day after thousands of websites temporarily shut-down to highlight the dangers of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA), federal prosecutors have pulled the plug on Megaupload.com, a website that was at one time among the top 20 most popular sites in the world.

American authorities helped issue arrests on Thursday for four people in New Zealand that they say are responsible for the website. According to the official indictment, unsealed the same day, Megaupload is being accused of costing copyright holders upwards of $500 million in lost revenues because of content illegally uploaded to its servers.

Megaupload is one of many highly visited websites that allows users to upload any media of their choice that might be too large for traditional online distribution. In lieu of email and instant messaging, users of Megaupload and similar sites can upload massive digital files and then pass the link to others across the world for easy download. The website claims that it has always been diligent in handling complaints regarding pirated material, but authorities have taken Megaupload offline while they investigate.

In a statement published by the US Department of Justice on the website for the Federal Bureau of Investigation Thursday afternoon, they call the charges “among the largest criminal copyright cases ever brought by the United States and directly targets the misuse of a public content storage and distribution site to commit and facilitate intellectual property crime.”

The news comes only hours after thousands of sites repealed a temporary blackout in opposition to SOPA and PIPA, which garnered support from sites including Wikipedia, Reddit and Google.

Kim Dotcom, formerly Kim Schmitz, was among the four in New Zealand that were arrested on Thursday for violating piracy laws. The company itself is listed as being based out of Hong Kong and names musician Swizz Beatz, husband to Grammy winner Alicia Keys, as its CEO. Dotcom is being pegged by authorities as the founder of Megaupload Limited and is among a roster of other persons accused of being affiliated, which includes citizens of the Netherlands, Estonia, Germany and Slovakia.
Back in America though, law enforcement officials conducted search warrants related to the charges, and seized, internationally, $50 million in assets.

While Megaupload is traditionally a free service, users are granted added incentives for purchasing subscriptions to the site. Advertisements are sold on its pages as well.

The Department of Justice writes that “for more than five years the conspiracy has operated websites that unlawfully reproduce and distribute infringing copies of copyrighted works, including movies — often before their theatrical release — music, television programs, electronic books and business and entertainment software on a massive scale.” The site has advertised on its own that it is visited by around 50 million users each day and constitutes for four percent of the Internet’s traffic. The DoJ believes those running the operation have netted more than $175 million in illegal profits by selling ads and subscriptions on the site.

According to the DoJ statement, “conspirators conducted their illegal operation using a business model expressly designed to promote uploading of the most popular copyrighted works for many millions of users to download.” Before going dark, however, Megaupload posted a statement on its website shunning allegations of wrongdoings.

"The fact is that the vast majority of Mega's Internet traffic is legitimate, and we are here to stay. If the content industry would like to take advantage of our popularity, we are happy to enter into a dialogue. We have some good ideas. Please get in touch," wrote the administrators.


Source - View The Webs Response Here
Download RT News Android App Here

Discuss..
« Last Edit: January 19, 2012, 10:00:56 pm by Warden »

pikachu

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,344
Re: Stop Online Piracy Act
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2012, 10:32:27 pm »
I think that the world is moving toward a new type of business model.  People expect things for free.  How will anyone make money?  Advertising.  We're on the precipice between traditional commerce and a world in which content is not directly paid for.  Consider Google: how much money have you ever given them?

The other extreme change is that content creation is shifting from a small set of companies to the people writ large.  This is an important and empowering change.  I think it's exciting, but will inevitably cause conflicts like what we're seeing right now.  In the end, we will win.

Jen

  • Pro Ninja
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,240
Re: Stop Online Piracy Act
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2012, 11:01:19 pm »
i'm scared of change
This post has been thanked 1 time Vault

Crisis

  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,018
Re: Stop Online Piracy Act
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2012, 06:47:06 am »
it's not change, so much as some of the old people have catching up to do

Loud

  • Banned
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1,077
Re: Stop Online Piracy Act
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2012, 12:04:30 am »
No, I'm pretty sure it's change...
Get money.
Rock ice.
Fuck hoes.

Smartass

  • Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 228
Re: Stop Online Piracy Act
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2012, 01:12:50 am »
Let it pass and we'll see how quickly his view changes on it. I, personally, want to rip this bill in half. But that's only out of selfish ambitions.

warrior

  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 409
  • Jesus Christ.
Re: Stop Online Piracy Act
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2012, 02:45:46 am »
Has anyone actually read the revised versions of this bill? It's actually not bad. All it does at this point, is standardize a process for something which already occurs (DNS filtering). Courts orders can already mandate this, and it only applies to foreign companies (excluding US Companies with foreign subsidiaries).

The real issue here is the centralized nature of the internet.
In capitalist America, bank robs you.

Choosing to code in an unmanaged language/platform is like choosing a hotel where you have to clean your own room.

When C++ is your hammer, everything starts to look like your thumb

 

newBalance by DzinerStudio